Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | 货号： 1655 | 1:72

基本信息

品牌:: Academy/Minicraft
标题:: Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk
数量:: 1655
比例:: 1:72
类型:: 完整套件
发布:: 1987 新的盒子
条码:: 048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)
包装:: 牛皮纸箱（正面打开）
主题:: Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » 螺旋桨 (飞机)

水贴

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2

中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

American Volunteer Group, 3 PS Hell's Angels 68 | P-8109 (Charles Older)
1942 World War 2 - Kunming
FS34079 FS30219 FS36463

开盒详情

注塑口 (Clear), 注塑口, 水贴

包装尺寸:
190x125x40 mm (7.5x4.9x1.6 inch)

产品时间线

Academy

Academy/Minicraft

Sunny

Modelist

Premium Hobbies

1987

1989

1996

1999

199x

2000

2002

2005

2008

2012

2014

202x

新模具

新的盒子

新模具

新的盒子

新零件

新的盒子

新贴花

新的盒子

新包装

全部历史 »

说明书

下载 2626Kb (.pdf)

市场

No partner shops available

开盒测评

外部链接评测

开盒测评

Modelingmadness

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?

21 October 2012, 09:19

Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.

21 October 2012, 10:30

Juan M Leria
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.

21 October 2012, 11:26

Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D

21 October 2012, 11:35

scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...

21 October 2012, 16:26