Mirage F1CR

ESCI/ERTL | Nr. 9062 | 1:72

Feiten

Merk:: ESCI/ERTL
Titel:: Mirage F1CR
Nummer:: 9062
Schaal:: 1:72
Type:: Volledig model
Uitgegeven:: 1988 Nieuwe onderdelen
Verpakking:: Stijve doos (Topopener)
Onderwerp:: Dassault Mirage F1 » Straalvliegtuigen (Vliegtuigen)

Markeringen

Dassault Mirage F1

Dassault Mirage F.1CR

Armée de l'Air (French Air Force 1934-2019)

ER 1/33 Belfort 33-CF | 649
1986
FS30277 FS30372 FS36270
ER 2/33 Savoie 33-NE | 607
1987
FS30277 FS30372 FS36270

Inhoud van de doos

Plastic Gietraam (Clear), Plastic Gietraam, Vel met natte transfers

Product tijdlijn

ESCI/ERTL

1988

1989

Handleidingen

Download 22341Kb (.pdf)

Marktplaats

No partner shops available

In-box reviews

Externe reviews

Quick look

Modelingmadness

Opmerkingen

Juan M Leria
On the other hand, do you think it's necessary split 'ESCI' and 'ESCI/ERTL'? It's like Italaerei and Italeri.
And the same for 'Heller' and 'Heller/Humbrol'

Alle reacties (10) » 22 November 2012, 16:58

Juan M Leria
@Mike.
The name 'Heller/Humbrol' reflected a change in overall ownership, but soon later (3-5 years) come back to 'Heller' alone. I think it's not interesting for us to open a 'Heller/Humbrol' company.
But 'Humbrol' alone released kits from other companies too, so it should have its own place.
I agree about the second comment.
@Gunther.
The question it isn't about the inclusion or not, but 'How to classify' them. We must include all we could (if space available)

23 November 2012, 11:52

Burkhard D
Let's be pragmatic, there is no 'perfect' solution.
Italeri and Italaerei go together very well, because they share the same catalogue numbers. Take Revell-Italeri kits: If the catalogue number is "H-xxx" it obviously fits into the Revell line, if it is something else it goes under the Italeri label. Same for Minicraft-Hasegawa or Minicraft vs Academy-Minicraft. Let's just judge by how the few kits in question fit into 'our' product ID system here.

23 November 2012, 13:14